Counting Young Tableaux
of Bounded Height*
François Bergeron, and Francis Gascon
Results
Let us first fix some notation. A partition of a positive integer
is a sequence of positive integers
![]()
such that
Clearly a partition is characterized by its diagram. The conjugate of a partition is the partition with diagram
where
runs over the set of points in the diagram, and the hook length is defined
as
For example, the first few sequences
are
See sequences M0769, M1184, M1212 in [5]. For ,
we have
See sequences M1459, M1666 in [5].
In [2] Gessel deduces, from a result of Gordon, the following formulas
and
if
is positive integer, J-k = Jk and
I-k=
Ik.
However the resulting expressions rapidly become unwieldy. For example,
Using properties of Bessel functions, we can somewhat simplify these
in the following manner. Recalling the easily deduced relations
we get, after computation, the much simpler expressions
Similarly with the ,
we get
A theoretical argument (see [2]) shows that the
generating functions
and
are D-finite. This is to say that they satisfy linear differential
equations with polynomial coefficients. In fact, it is well known and classical
that one can translate such linear differential equations as recurrences,
with polynomial coefficients. More precisely, a P-recurrence for
a sequence
is one of the form
Computer experiments made by Krob, Favreau and the first author led
to conjectures (see [1]) for an explicit form for
P-recurrence
for
and
.
These conjectures can easily be (automatically) reformulated as linear
differential equations for
and
.
We first observe that it is not to hard to show the existence of a polynomial
coefficients linear differential equation of order bounded by
Proof. Setting ,
it is clear from our previous discussion that
lies in the span
of the set of
elements:
from which we deduce that
as well as a similar expression for the derivative of .
Thus,
is contained in
,
and hence its dimension is bounded by
.
Setting for the moment,
it clearly follows from the proposition above, that
hence
satisfies a homogeneous linear differential equation of order
with coefficients polynomials in
.
However, a sharper relation seems to hold. In fact, we conjecture that
The first few cases
are
Equating coefficients of
on both hand sides of these differential equations, one finds that they
are equivalent to the recurrences
Up to now, only these recurrences (meaning for ),
have been implicitly known (see [3]). However, using the simplified expressions
for
given here, and a reformulation in term of linear differential equations,
with the help of gfun, we have been able to check (in the form of
a computer algebra proof) that the conjecture above is true for
,
thus it follows that the corresponding recurrences hold. This computer
verification simply uses the derivation rules (1) for
to simplify the expressions obtained by substitution of Gessel formulas
in the following differential equations.
However, these verifications rapidly become (computer) time consuming,
since, for example, we have to simplify the result of substituting in the
differential equation
the following expression
Similar considerations for the
case, with the differential equations below, settle the corresponding conjectures
for
.
Acknowledgement
The Maple package gfun(available
as a shared library) was used extensively in the elaboration of the conjectures
and results in this note.
References