Counting Young Tableaux

of Bounded Height*
 
 

François Bergeron,  and  Francis Gascon

We show that formulas of Gessel, for the generating functions for Young standard tableaux of height bounded by k (see [2]), satisfy linear differential equations, with polynomial coefficients, equivalent to P-recurrences conjectured by Favreau, Krob and the first author (see [1]) for the number of bounded height tableaux and pairs of bounded height tableaux.


Results
 

Let us first fix some notation. A partition of a positive integer    is a sequence of positive  integers

such that

We denote   this fact, and say that   is the height of .  The (Ferrers) diagram of a partition is the set of points

Clearly a partition is characterized by its diagram. The conjugate of a partition is the partition with diagram

A  Young standard tableau    of shape   is an injective labeling of the Ferrers diagram of   by the elements of  the set , such that  and  when   and .   For a given  , the number of tableau of shape   is given by the formula
displaymath370

where   runs over the set of points in the diagram, and the hook length is defined as

Other classical results in this context are
and
displaymath373
We are interested in the enumeration of tableaux of height bounded by some integer ,  this is to say that we want to compute the numbers

as well as

For example, the first few sequences  are

See sequences M0769, M1184, M1212 in [5]. For , we have

See sequences M1459, M1666 in [5].

In [2] Gessel deduces, from a result of Gordon, the following formulas

displaymath455

and

displaymath457

where

displaymath459

and

displaymath461

if   is positive integer, J-k = Jk and I-k= Ik. However the resulting expressions rapidly become unwieldy. For example,

Using properties of Bessel functions, we can somewhat simplify these in the following manner. Recalling the easily deduced relations

we get, after computation, the much simpler expressions

Similarly with the , we get


A theoretical argument (see [2]) shows that the generating functions  and  are D-finite. This is to say that they satisfy linear differential equations with polynomial coefficients. In fact, it is well known and classical that one can translate such linear differential equations as recurrences, with polynomial coefficients. More precisely, a P-recurrence for a sequence  is one of the form


We say that a sequence is P-recursive if it satisfies some P-recurrence. The class of P-recursive sequences is closed under point-wise product. Since   is easily seen to be P-recursive, it follows that, if  is P-recursive then so are and . The algorithmic translation from D-finite to P-recursive (and back) has been implemented in the package gfunin Maple (see [4]), as well as many other nice tools for handling recurrences and generating functions.

Computer experiments made by Krob, Favreau and the first author led to conjectures (see [1]) for an explicit form for P-recurrence for  and . These conjectures can easily be (automatically) reformulated as linear differential equations for  and . We first observe that it is not to hard to show the existence of a polynomial coefficients linear differential equation of order bounded by

admitting   as a solution. In fact, this follows readily from the following proposition.


Proof. Setting , it is clear from our previous discussion that   lies in the span   of the set of  elements:

if   is even, and
if   is odd. Now,  is clearly closed under derivation, since we easily see that

eqnarray181

from which we deduce that

eqnarray187

as well as a similar expression for the derivative of . Thus,   is contained in , and hence its dimension is bounded by .

Setting for the moment,  it clearly follows from  the proposition above, that

hence   satisfies a homogeneous linear differential equation of order   with coefficients polynomials in . However, a sharper relation seems to hold. In fact, we conjecture that
 

The first few cases   are

Equating coefficients of   on both hand sides of these differential equations, one finds that they are equivalent to the recurrences

Up to now, only these recurrences (meaning for ), have been implicitly known (see [3]). However, using the simplified expressions for  given here, and a reformulation in term of linear differential equations, with the help of gfun, we have been able to check (in the form of a computer algebra proof) that the conjecture above is true for ,  thus it follows that the corresponding recurrences hold. This computer verification simply uses the derivation rules (1) for  to simplify the expressions obtained by substitution of Gessel formulas in the following differential equations.

However, these verifications rapidly become (computer) time consuming, since, for example, we have to simplify the result of substituting in the differential equation

the following expression

Similar considerations for the   case, with the differential equations below, settle the corresponding conjectures for .


 
 

Acknowledgement
 

The Maple package gfun(available as a shared library) was used extensively in the elaboration of the conjectures and results in this note.
 
 

References
 
 

[1]
F. Bergeron, L. Favreau and D. Krob, Conjectures on the Enumeration of Tableaux of Bounded Height, Discrete Math., 139, (1995), 463-468.
[2]
I. Gessel, Symmetric Functions and P-Recursiveness, Jour. of Comb. Th., Series A, 53, 1990, 257-285.
[3]
D. Gouyou Beauchamps, Codages par des mots et des chemins: problèmes combinatoires et algorithmiques, Ph. D. thesis, University of Bordeaux I, 1985.
[4]
B. Salvy and P. Zimmermann, GFUN: A maple Package for the Manipulation of Generating Functions in one Variable, ACM Trans. in Math. Software, 20, 1994, pages 163-177.
[5]
N.J.A Sloane and S. Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1995.


Footnote:  *With support from NSERC and FCAR.